ewolf mini was trading one to four contracts and suddenly one time he had to keep adding inspite drawdown to 420 contracts of ym to make him look good to show us that he has good track record ... who in their right mind caN trade 420 contracts while he is trading 4 contracts on average same thing i suspect will happen one of these days HERE instead of 25 contrACTS HE WILL ONE DAY END UP WITH 500 CONTRACT TO KEEP HIS WINNING PERCENTAGE HIGH iT IS ANOTHER WAY TO THROW SAND IN THE EYES OF STUPID FOLLOWERS . JUST LIKE ALL POLITICIANS DO
So far I see that there are a lot of signals and surprisingly many of them are cancels and replaces which is o.k. if it were not for the fact that I have already filled before the cancel was sent. So commission cost is high just to keep up with the signals. Also, in some cases cancels are sent after reported fills. If you follow the log in tradebullet or tradebolt, you will see the same. I am going to continue for a few more weeks, but so far it looks like the author is using the cancels and replaces to cover himself when he makes bad trades.
If you look at the August drawdowns for closed trades, wouldn't it have been more profitable to go against Hawk's trades? Yes, they did eventually close for much smaller profits.
I have subscribed to the system since 05/18/2006 and been auto-trading it from the beginning. So far, I am almost break-even after the slippage and commission/subion. Although the market has been tough for the last three months or so, this system, to my impression, performed better in a monkey market than in a clear upwards/downwards trend market because it is trying to catch the short-term bottom. Overall, I feel this system is just OK, definitely not as good as that shown in the equity curve.
This is one of the most professional systems in C2.W/L ratio is not great, but the results are.Instead of sitting on hughe drawdowns, trader cuts losses and let winners run.No overnights, no average ins.
Excellent system for people interested in making money , instead of creating great statistics without loosers.
I tried a week and lost $4149 while C2 posted $4768 profit. Majority trades are scalping but slippages turn small profits into losses. There are a lot signals (50+) a day, hard to keep up manually. Using mostly Limit orders causes major problem for using AutoTrade. C2 Realism Factor 89 is a joke.
Leaves way too many pips on the table, once a trending position has been taken, for my liking. This probably has something to do with setting up the entire entry, stop/exit strategy from the beginning, rather than managing the trade in progress (the best way to trade forex). Last trade only caught 15 pips of a 100+ pip run. Lazy.
I have been a subscriber for 2 weeks now, so far I like what I see. Hawk uses a different type of approach in trading, which is very good to say the least. One thing that whoever that subscribe to this system must understand is the fact that the Author recommends only about 5% or less exposure to each trade, if you do not over trade your account by leveraging too much, you should be fine. I have endured up to a 250 pips move against me and I have seen it coming back. The trick is to, again, not overtrade. Just use his guideline in the lots sizes and you should be fine.
I still don't know why trades reported by C2 and my auto trade (FX-Auto) executed ones are different. If my auto trade can be set up right, then I should see the virtually (almost) the same trades. But I have a difficulty setting up...
I have been watching this system since the very start. Ups, downs, and the vendor never leaving his system orphaned as others did. Excellent.
Unfortunatey I will not proceed with my subscription, as you seem to need autotrading. But I don't trust yet after poor experience with tradebullet autotrading another system. If you can sit in front of the screeen all day, this system is a real winner.
Very profitable system despite what the realism factor shows. The reality here is that if you subscribe to this system, you will make money. I subscribe to all of this system creator's systems.
A very practical, underated system for the serious investor. It is very hard to find equity trading systems with this high a win/loss ratio and excellent risk management. You won't get rich quick, but you won't be getting margin calls from your broker.
The downside is it is difficult to autotrade if not impossible so there is a fair amount of time involved with manual inputs.
i'm having a hard time actually making any money... I think because i'm scaled to trading only about 3 contracts per tran. After commisions etc. there is very little left...
Had decent results. Althought IB uses different symbols that are not exactly the same prices. Some issues when profit taking LIMIT was sent along with initial entry STOP order. Sometimes price took off and you entered above exit LIMIT which immediately unloaded your position for small loss (see 7/13 trade on HOQ6).
I thought this was a "trading system" for the NDX (vs. a buy and hold system) where to quote the author "Signals are mostly generated on a weekly basis". Prior to this last trade the NDX Relax Zone System traded about every 2-2.5 weeks since its inception. This losing trade has been held onto for almost 2 MONTHS. A.)where's the exit plan for a losing trade of this magnitude and B.) where's the risk management for each trade?
I've been trading this system automatically since December 2005, so for 8 months now. My capital has increased more than 100% in this time. There have been some uncomfortable drawdowns, but if you have the recommended account size you can survive to trade another day. The majority of his trades are very short and low risk, as you can see in the C2 results. I've never seen a % profitable of 97% with over 100 consecutive wins. In my opinion, this man has skill.
I have been making trades with the Penny Stock Movers picks for a few months and it has been by far the most profitable system I have used. I am a newer and smaller investor, so I really appreciate the service. I couldn't do it on my own.
